Если кому-то интересно - вот, что я получил от нашего дизайнера:
I would say that I highly recommend it. Over numerous versions of InDesign, it has managed to work consistently.
When talking with a client about remote editing I give them the options of InCopy versus DocsFlow.
What I like about DocsFlow versus InCopy is that it works for any skill level. If the client can edit a Google doc, they can use DocsFlow. InCopy requires a higher skill set.
InDesign controls all of the text formatting for the most part. Styles you apply in InDesign get preserved as the client edits and what the client sees is simplified.
You need to instruct the editor not to worry about formatting the text, regardless of how it looks on their end. They only need to focus on editing the content. But, sometimes they need to apply italics and bolding. If they do, the formatting they apply won't be easily visible on your end. This has caused problems for some editors, and my solution is to turn on the Style Overrides Highlighter on the Paragraphs panel, which highlights the places where italics or bolding has been applied.
Docsflow works with an individual text frame or story, FYI, not the whole InDesign document. This can sometimes be a challenge.
For example, you have a newsletter article with sidebar and caption info. The sidebar and caption would likely be separate text frames in the InDesign layout, but you'll need to thread these text frames to the main text frame in order to keep all the info in one Google Doc.
When you connect a text frame or story to Google docs it shows up in your links panel. When an editor edits the Google doc you'll see that the links need to updated in the Links panel. Once updated, you'll see the new text flow in.
When the editor removes a large chunk of text, it can sometimes create a style conflict that shows up as a Note in InDesign. It's a good idea to open the Notes panel after updating the text to see all of the notes and resolve them.
Hope this helps. Let me know if there are any questions.